Wednesday, February 9, 2011

DISCUSSION DIRECTOR!!

1. Do you think Alex should have taken a bigger gun into the wilderness to try and kill a big game animal and hopefully survive longer?

2. Should Alex have tried to hike up the river in order to cross and go back to civilization when his instincts told him to?

3. Do you think killing an animal should be treated as holy? Why or why not?
Posted by at

2 comments:

  1. His Royal Highness Kiernon HogardFebruary 9, 2011 at 1:08 PM

    1. yes, probably a smith and wesson 500 or something of a similar caliber.
    2. yes, but first before going into the wilderness he shoud have gotten a better map.
    3. no, they are our prey, that is the closest they get to holy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. G-RiME$February 9, 2011 at 1:17 PM

    1. Yea he shoulda took a .50 cal sniper and a baretta.

    2. Yes because since he didnt he wasnt fully prepared which led to him dying.. haha

    3. No.. its nature.. the food chain.. killing animals is meant to be.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)